• About
  • FAQ
  • Landing Page
Newsletter
Advertisement
  • Home
    • Home – Layout 1
    • Home – Layout 2
    • Home – Layout 3
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Regulation
  • Market
  • Blockchain
  • Business
  • Guide
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Home – Layout 1
    • Home – Layout 2
    • Home – Layout 3
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Regulation
  • Market
  • Blockchain
  • Business
  • Guide
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Business

If humans vanished, Bitcoin’s block time and difficulty would preserve our collapse

admin by admin
26 11 月, 2025
in Business
0
If humans vanished, Bitcoin’s block time and difficulty would preserve our collapse
189
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter



This is a speculative report translated for non-specialists. The narrator is an investigator who arrived long after humans were gone. Everything described as measured relies on real Bitcoin mechanics: block intervals, difficulty/target, timestamp rules, and data available from block headers and the coinbase transaction.

We arrived on a silent planet. The last clocks still ticking were embedded in a ledger whose authors were gone.


REPORT START

Team: Survey Unit 3
Artifact: Global ledger (“Bitcoin”)
Technique: Lightweight chain analysis (headers + coinbase), mapped to solar time

Method

We analyzed the digital artifact known as Bitcoin using what we identified as block headers (timestamp, target / “bits”, version) and each block’s coinbase transaction (height, output value, and tag text).

From our previous initial review we’ve constructed the following data points:

  • Fees were treated as: coinbase output − programmed subsidy (fees actually claimed by the miner).
  • Timestamps were calibrated to the planet’s solar day and year and bounded by Bitcoin’s median-time-past (MTP) rule.
  • Evidence of tip contention (stale blocks) was inferred from timing irregularities and MTP edge effects; where any stale-block archives survived on isolated nodes, they corroborated those periods.
  • Difficulty retargets occurred every 2016 blocks with the actual_timespan clamped to 0.25×–4× of the two-week target, implying a per-epoch difficulty change bounded to at most 4× in either direction.

Findings

Cessation of payments

We recorded ΔH (blocks before present) to be ≈ 86,000. Coinbase outputs were equal to the programmed subsidy, implying fees ≈ 0. Over that same interval, average block spacing settled near ~60–70 minutes with a long-segment mean of ~65 minutes.

Interpretation: Human-directed payments had ceased. Mechanical issuance continued.
Dating: 86,000 blocks × ~65 minutes ≈ ~10.6 years before our arrival.

Related articles

Bitcoin just lost $90,000, and a quiet surge in energy markets suggests the pain isn’t over

Bitcoin just lost $90,000, and a quiet surge in energy markets suggests the pain isn’t over

29 12 月, 2025
Bitmain just slashed mining rig prices, proving the market’s oldest “Bitcoin rule” is officially dead

Bitmain just slashed mining rig prices, proving the market’s oldest “Bitcoin rule” is officially dead

29 12 月, 2025

Power-source timing signatures

Post-collapse block arrivals were not memoryless. Diurnal and seasonal cadence encoded the unattended power mix:

  • Daytime clusters with nighttime gaps repeated across low-latitude longitudes → unattended solar with degrading storage.
  • Irregular multi-hour bursts punctuated by multi-day voids at mid-latitudes → wind that faulted during storms and wasn’t reset.
  • Persistent overnight presence at a few longitudes → small hydro or geothermal operating islanded.

We aligned repeated intraday timestamp clusters to local solar noon to estimate longitude bands of surviving sites. The strength of seasonal variation in block arrivals gave coarse latitude bands. Precise site coordinates were not recoverable.

Difficulty terraces (the fade, timed)

Immediately after the hashrate shock, average block time jumped from ~10 minutes to hours. Because difficulty only retargets every 2016 blocks and each epoch’s change is bounded, the chain formed terraces, plateaus of near-constant average interval separated by discrete down-steps.

Representative sequence observed in the global ledger:

  • Terrace A: ~16–17 h/block for 2016 blocks → elapsed ~3.8 years.
  • Terrace B: ~4.1 h/block for 2016 blocks → ~0.95 years.
  • Terrace C: ~62–65 min/block for 2016 blocks → ~87–91 days.
  • Terrace D: ~15–16 min/block for ~22 days, after which renewed hardware failures re-slowed the chain.

Where residual hashrate was ≈1% of pre-event, Terrace A alone spanned ~3.8 years at ~16.7 h/block. At ≈0.1%, the same 2016-block epoch would have stretched to ~38 years at ~167 h/block, still within the protocol’s adjustment bound. One region’s cadence matched the ~16–17 h/block case.

How to read a terrace (worked calc):

Epoch length = 2016 blocks. If the observed interval on a plateau is 16.7 hours, elapsed time for that epoch ≈ 2016 × 16.7 h ≈ 3.84 years.

Network decay captured in the record

Once accurate clocks vanished, miner timestamps drifted in coherent regional patterns. Bitcoin’s MTP rule limited abuse of timestamps (each new block had to be later than the median of the prior 11) but did not eliminate drift signatures.

Interval variance and clustered MTP-bounded timestamp advances revealed intermittent partitions and tip contention; when any link resumed (e.g., satellite, microwave), competing branches reconciled and only the winning branch remained canonical.

Without preserved stale-block archives, measured contention is a lower bound.

Maker marks that outlived their makers

Coinbase tag strings (pool labels) and stable nonce/version fingerprints persisted for years after fee activity ended. Defaults were never changed once operators were gone, leaving software/hardware families identifiable in the record. (Coinbase tags are visible via the coinbase transaction; headers alone do not carry them.)

Dating key events (worked examples)

  • “Payments ended.” Window where coinbase output = subsidy began at ΔH ≈ 86,000. Using the observed ~65 min/block: ~10.6 years before present.
  • First post-shock retarget completed. The initial 2016-block reduction finished ~3.8 years after the hashrate collapse (plateau at ~16.7 h/block).
  • Final detectable hydro cadence. The last night-heavy, near-constant signature ceased ~1.9 years before present; the prior seven spring seasons showed increasing multi-day outages consistent with intake clogging and flood damage.

All conversions use observed segment averages, not the nominal 10-minute target.

Duration estimate (how long machines ran)

  • Minimum confirmed: >10 years after economic activity ceased (from fee collapse to last hydro-like cadence).
  • Plausible upper bound (regional): Multi-decadal operation at extremely low hashrate, where a single 2016-block epoch spans decades due to the adjustment bound.

The only requirements were: (a) at least one surviving power source and (b) an intermittent path for some blocks to reach the global network.

Summary report

Ultimately, the ledger shows when payments stopped, how energy tapered, how networks frayed, and how long unattended machines kept writing time, enough to reconstruct the end of activity from headers and coinbase alone.

END OF REPORT


What readers should take from this

  • Bitcoin behaves like an instrument. Difficulty rules and timestamp constraints transduce physical reality, power availability, operator absence, and network partitions into a durable time series.
  • Physical failure, not price, ended the write. Dust, clogged screens, tripped breakers, drifting clocks, broken links.
  • These forensics apply today. Block spacing, fee pressure (via coinbase delta), timestamp drift, and retarget dynamics are actionable diagnostics for present-day outages and partitions.

Limits

  • Longitude bands were estimable; precise sites were not. Latitude was inferred only coarsely from seasonality strength.
  • Fully isolated “shadow mining” may have produced blocks that never reached the global ledger.
  • Without preserved stale-block archives, contention estimates are lower bounds; some races leave no canonical trace.
  • Once synchronized time sources failed, MTP primarily preserved relative ordering, not accurate civil time; long-range calendar dates carry additional uncertainty even when intraday/seasonal structure is clear.
  • In very low-hashrate regimes dominated by a single surviving operator, timestamps could be marched within MTP limits, partially masking diurnal signatures; cross-checks with nonce patterns and coinbase tags mitigate but do not eliminate this.
  • Most OP_RETURN payloads were not decodable at scale and were not interpreted.



Source link

Share76Tweet47

Related Posts

Bitcoin just lost $90,000, and a quiet surge in energy markets suggests the pain isn’t over

Bitcoin just lost $90,000, and a quiet surge in energy markets suggests the pain isn’t over

by admin
29 12 月, 2025
0

Bitcoin traded near ...

Bitmain just slashed mining rig prices, proving the market’s oldest “Bitcoin rule” is officially dead

Bitmain just slashed mining rig prices, proving the market’s oldest “Bitcoin rule” is officially dead

by admin
29 12 月, 2025
0

Bitmain cut prices o...

Ethereum’s record staking queue looks bullish, but one corporate giant is secretly distorting the real signal

Ethereum’s record staking queue looks bullish, but one corporate giant is secretly distorting the real signal

by admin
29 12 月, 2025
0

A single corporate t...

What if Bitcoin blocks signaled the New Year? Creating Universal Bitcoin Time but trapping holders in a tax nightmare

What if Bitcoin blocks signaled the New Year? Creating Universal Bitcoin Time but trapping holders in a tax nightmare

by admin
28 12 月, 2025
0

Bitcoin miners produ...

Coinbase claims arrest in the $355 million insider extortion scheme that targeted nearly 70,000 customers

Coinbase claims arrest in the $355 million insider extortion scheme that targeted nearly 70,000 customers

by admin
28 12 月, 2025
0

Coinbase said a form...

Load More
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Elon Musk Offers to Buy 100% of Twitter, Calls it ‘Best and Final Offer’

Elon Musk Offers to Buy 100% of Twitter, Calls it ‘Best and Final Offer’

4 3 月, 2023

US Commodities Regulator Beefs Up Bitcoin Futures Review

16 1 月, 2023

High-Speed Traders In Search of New Markets Jump Into Bitcoin

11 1 月, 2023
Liquidations Soar in Crypto Market while Some Traders Hope for ‘Upcoming Bounce’

Liquidations Soar in Crypto Market while Some Traders Hope for ‘Upcoming Bounce’

4 3 月, 2023

US Commodities Regulator Beefs Up Bitcoin Futures Review

0

Bitcoin Hits 2018 Low as Concerns Mount on Regulation, Viability

0

India: Bitcoin Prices Drop As Media Misinterprets Gov’s Regulation Speech

0

Bitcoin’s Main Rival Ethereum Hits A Fresh Record High: $425.55

0
These 3 Cryptos Came Back From Dead In 2025

These 3 Cryptos Came Back From Dead In 2025

29 12 月, 2025
Aptos’ APT delines on below average volume

Aptos’ APT delines on below average volume

29 12 月, 2025
Bitcoin price consolidates near $87K as downside risk persist

Bitcoin price consolidates near $87K as downside risk persist

29 12 月, 2025
The White Whale up 10x in a week! Lighter TGE! Saylor buys $109M BTC!

The White Whale up 10x in a week! Lighter TGE! Saylor buys $109M BTC!

29 12 月, 2025

We bring you the best Premium WordPress Themes that perfect for news, magazine, personal blog, etc. Check our landing page for details.

Categories tes

  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Business
  • Ethereum
  • Guide
  • Market
  • Regulation
  • Ripple

Tags

Altcoin Bitcoin drops Bitcoin Wallet Cointelegraph Cryptocurrency ICO Investment Lending Market Stories Mining Bitcoin

Newsletter

[mc4wp_form]

  • About
  • FAQ
  • Support Forum
  • Landing Page
  • Contact Us

© 2017 JNews - Crafted with love by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Homepages
  • Business
  • Guide

© 2025 Cryptonewsz All rights reserved.