Bitwise’s Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) pulled in $56 million in volume on its launch day, while Canary Capital’s spot XRP ETF (XRPC) posted $58 million, the highest two volumes for any ETF launched in 2025.
Yet, SOL traded near $205 one day before the ETF launch and slumped to $165 within a week, a 20% drop during what K33’s Vetle Lunde called “a clear success” in terms of flows. As of press time, SOL traded around $140.
XRP slipped 7% within 48 hours surrounding its ETF debut, dropping from the region between $2.40 and $2.50 toward the low $2.20. Both coins are now at multi-month lows, while their ETF wrappers continue to log positive net creations.
The paradox isn’t actually paradoxical. These ETFs were launched exactly as designed into a particularly challenging part of the cycle, which consisted of heavy profit-taking, macro risk-off sentiment, and capital reshuffling within the crypto space, rather than fresh money arriving from outside.
Record ETF prints and red spot charts can coexist because they measure different things.
Volume doesn’t equal net buying
The “record volume” headlines for BSOL and XRPC describe the number of ETF shares that changed hands, not the amount of new capital that entered the underlying coins.
Those numbers capture secondary trading between early buyers, fast money, and market-makers. They include rebalancing out of other crypto exposures into the new wrapper.
They contain short-term arbitrage where traders buy the ETF and hedge by selling futures or spot SOL/XRP, which can actually pressure prices downward.
Net inflows, which involve the creation of new ETF shares that require actual coin purchases, were strong but relatively small compared to the market size.
CoinShares data indicate that Solana products generated approximately $421 million in one week, with further inflows exceeding $100 million in subsequent weeks.
Despite registering $245 million in inflows on its debut day, the Canary fund was part of the XRP funds group, which saw $15.5 million in outflows last week, suggesting a U-turn in inflows.
The bottom line is: against tokens with market caps in the tens of billions and heavy existing derivatives open interest, those flows don’t move the needle immediately.
The ETF plumbing explains the lag. Canary’s S-1 makes clear that the trust holds XRP directly and creates or redeems shares in 10,000-share “baskets.”
Authorized participants can deliver cash or XRP to create baskets, with the trust sourcing coins via approved venues.
Most launch-day excitement remains in the secondary market, as ETF shares can change hands throughout the day without triggering any creation or redemption at the trust level.
Where creations do occur, they’re often hedged. APs and market-makers routinely buy ETF shares and sell futures or spot to manage risk.
In a risk-off environment, that hedge leg contributes to downward pressure on the underlying coin even as the ETF itself grows.
Launching into a drawdown
These ETFs didn’t arrive in a vacuum. Since mid-October, Bitcoin has given back most of its 2025 gains, falling about 22% from its early-October peak near $126,000 to below $93,000.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs simultaneously flipped from record inflows to heavy redemptions.
Solana and XRP funds are the bright spots in that dataset. Solana especially has “bucked the trend” with back-to-back weeks of inflows, before registering $8.3 million in outflows last week.
These altcoin ETFs are swimming upstream against broad de-risking in everything from BTC ETFs to tech stocks.
Record launches in a structurally hostile macro window produce exactly this outcome: strong relative performance for the new products, weak absolute performance for the underlying assets.
The flows data reveal something else: capital going into altcoin ETFs is rotating from elsewhere in the crypto stack rather than arriving as fresh fiat.
Following the Oct. 10 liquidation event, digital asset ETPs experienced $513 million in total outflows. However, Solana and XRP funds still attracted $156 million and $73.9 million, respectively.
Altcoin ETFs are gaining market share within crypto ETPs, while the overall ETP market is shrinking. For spot prices, that redistributes existing risk across tickers rather than injecting new demand.
The expectations tax
Both SOL and XRP experienced significant run-ups in the lead-up to their ETF listings. Trading data shows SOL climbing from local lows around $177 to approximately $203-205 in the week leading up to the Oct. 28 ETF debut, fueled by aggressive bullish positioning and headlines targeting upside scenarios of over $ 400.
Once BSOL actually launched, that pre-positioning flipped. Profit-taking, stretched valuations, and weakening risk appetite drove SOL’s 20% drop from $205 to $165 despite the ETF’s second-strongest-ever inflow week.
XRP showed the same pattern compressed into a tighter timeframe. The SEC’s generic listing rule in September flagged Solana and XRP as likely first beneficiaries.
XRP rallied on each incremental step toward listing, from Nasdaq’s certification to the final 8-A filing. By the time XRPC opened, Binance News described the intraday move as a “classic sell-the-news” reaction.
The ETF is structurally bullish, but much of that bullishness is already priced in ahead of time. Launch day is when early longs finally have a big, liquid venue to sell into. The product succeeds by its own metrics while the trade that anticipated it gets unwound.
Wrapper innovation doesn’t repeal the cycle
The day-one paradox resolves into a few clean threads. These are real products with real demand. BSOL and XRPC genuinely set 2025 records on first-day metrics and generated hundreds of millions in creations, even as the broader ETP universe bled capital.
They arrived late in the cycle, not early. The launches followed a year of aggressive price appreciation and optimism for ETFs.
By the time tickers went live, SOL and XRP were already crowded trades, with investors using the ETF window to de-risk and lock in gains.
The macro tide is flowing out. Bitcoin’s drawdown from $126,000 to sub-$100,000, the $2.3 billion outflows in ETFs, and rising rate-cut uncertainty mean even good micro stories can’t overpower the higher-beta nature of altcoins.
Mechanics mute the short-term effect. Day-one ETF “volume” is a noisy mix of seeding, intraday churn, and hedged arbitrage.
Net creations have been strong but too small, and too offset by selling elsewhere in crypto, to dictate price in the first few weeks.
The forward-looking question is whether this paradox resolves if ETF inflows continue to compound while Bitcoin and Ethereum stabilize.
Does sustained institutional wrapper demand eventually pull spot prices higher? Or does the market treat these as new vehicles for existing capital to rotate through?
The answer depends on whether fresh fiat arrives or whether crypto remains stuck in internal reshuffling mode.
The day-one paradox isn’t a failure of the ETF trade, but rather a reminder that wrapper innovation doesn’t repeal the cycle. It just gives the cycle a new set of tickers to express itself through.
