Zcash (ZEC) suffered the steepest decline among top-tier digital assets on Jan. 8, plunging approximately 20% amid a collision of governance turmoil and a leverage-driven market flush.
According to CryptoSlate data, Zcash fell to a month-low of $382, making it the day’s biggest loser on the Top 100 leaderboard.
This price performance decoupled violently from the broader crypto markets, where digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum had registered muted losses during the reporting period.
The catalyst for the rout was the abrupt exit of the entire Electric Coin Company (ECC) team, the group historically responsible for Zcash’s core development, following a breakdown in negotiations with the protocol’s overseeing nonprofit board.
The Zcash governance dispute
The selloff began in earnest after Josh Swihart, the former CEO of Electric Coin Company, announced the team’s collective departure on the social media platform X.
Swihart stated the team had been “constructively discharged” by the Bootstrap board, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit created to support Zcash by governing ECC.
Swihart specifically named board members Zaki Manian, Christina Garman, Alan Fairless, and Michelle Lai, collectively referred to as “ZCAM,” alleging they had moved into “clear misalignment” with the project’s mission.
According to him:
“The terms of our employment were changed in ways that made it impossible for us to perform our duties effectively and with integrity.”
He added that the team intends to found a new company to continue their work, asserting that the move was necessary to protect their efforts from “malicious governance actions.”
However, the Bootstrap board issued a rebuttal framing the conflict not as a malicious purge, but as a necessary defense of nonprofit fiduciary standards.
In a statement, the board expressed sadness at the team’s departure but clarified that the dispute centered on a proposal to privatize “Zashi,” a product within the ecosystem.
Bootstrap noted that, while it explored external investment to privatize Zashi, it was bound by strict legal obligations governing the transfer of charitable assets and intellectual property.
The board drew a direct parallel to the corporate governance struggles at OpenAI, warning that restructuring a nonprofit’s assets for private benefit invites regulatory peril.
They stated:
“OpenAI’s restructuring drew intense scrutiny from attorneys general, former employees, and public interest groups over concerns about conflicts of interest and fair valuation of charitable assets.”
The board argued that the proposed transaction, in its final state, introduced vulnerabilities for politically motivated attacks on Zcash.
“Any of its donors could sue. The transaction could be unwound,” the board stated, adding that “good intentions do not satisfy legal requirements, and urgency does not excuse a flawed process.”
Despite the friction, Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn attempted to calm market fears regarding the protocol’s safety. He said:
“The Zcash network is open source, permissionless, secure, and private, and nothing that happens in this conflict can change that.”
He also vouched for the integrity of the board members involved, noting he had worked with Fairless, Manian, and Garman for over a decade.
The leverage flush
While the governance news provided the spark, market data suggests the depth of the crash was exacerbated by an overheated derivatives market.
According to CoinGlass data, the market was primed for a squeeze. Zcash saw roughly $4.4 billion in futures volume over 24 hours compared to just over $1.1 billion in spot volume. With open interest close to $900 million and approximately $23 million in liquidations, the market entered a mechanical feedback loop.
As prices dropped amid governance headlines, leveraged positions were liquidated, forcing market sellers into a spot book that lacked the depth to absorb them.
This dynamic widened spreads and pushed prices through key support levels, resulting in an “air pocket” drop rather than a gradual repricing.
The move was further complicated by a “narrative whiplash” regarding Zcash’s supply dynamics.
Throughout 2025, a bullish thesis had formed around the “scarcity-by-shielding” narrative, as shielded holdings grew to approximately 4.9 million ZEC, or 30% of supply, according to Grayscale.
However, reporting earlier this week indicated a reversal of that trend.
Data showed that in the first week of January, more than 200,000 ZEC, roughly 1.2% of the circulating supply, was withdrawn from shielded pools.
Markets often interpret such “unshielding” as a precursor to selling, since most exchange-based trading is transparent. This pre-existing supply anxiety made the market highly sensitive to the governance shock.
What’s next for ZEC?
Market participants are now weighing whether this rupture represents a temporary reset or a permanent impairment of the project’s credibility.
Some prominent voices in the community remain aggressively bullish. Mert Mumtaz, a well-known crypto commentator, described the ECC team’s exit as a positive unlocking of value.
“Extremely bullish Zcash’s most competent… now unburdened by the crippling inefficiencies of foundation politics,” Mumtaz said, reaffirming a long-term price target of $10,000 and adding, “The money is actually gonna be encrypted.”
Sean Bowe, a developer within the Zcash ecosystem, also shared this bullishness, saying:
“I’m really excited that the legendary team at ECC is regrouping under a new structure, so that they can continue to build for Zcash without the shackles of Bootstrap’s broken and misaligned nonprofit corporate structure. The potential unlock here is enormous.”
These individuals’ position aligns with the privacy meta that has gripped the crypto market in recent times.
Notably, venture capital firm a16z, in its projections for the new year, has argued that privacy will be the most important moat in crypto.
This view is also shared by asset management firm Grayscale, which stated that:
“If public blockchains are going to be more deeply integrated into the financial system, they will need much more robust privacy infrastructure — and this is becoming obvious now that regulation is facilitating that integration (via market structure legislation).”
